Office: +44 203 968 0500
24/7 Emergency Response: +44 7887 710 950
Select Page

A caution to judgment debtors and their advisers

Settling claims – do’s and don’ts | BDM Blog | BDM Law

In one of our previous posts, we had commented on the possibility of suing advisers if it can be proved that they have facilitated the asset-stripping with the intention of frustrating claims by creditors. There is now a new Supreme Court decision out which confirms that one can sue an adviser who conspires to help a judgment debtor move his assets out of the country – https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2017-0043-judgment.pdf.

In JSC BTA Bank v Khrapunov, the Bank brought a claim against Mr Khrapunov for being involved in an unlawful means conspiracy as he assisted his father in law, Mr Ablyazov, to dissipate and conceal Mr Ablyazov’s assets in contempt of court. The Court held that contempt of court constituted an “unlawful means” for the tort of conspiracy by unlawful means and as such Mr Khrapunov was liable. It was also ruled that the English court had jurisdiction, under article 5(3) of the Lugano Convention, as the conspiracy occurred in England even though the actions took place abroad. The Court focused on the fact that the agreement of the conspiracy was made in England which is the event that set the tort in motion.

BDM is a specialist shipping law firm offering high quality legal advice and representation at a reasonable price.  Please follow us on social media by clicking below.

BDM is a specialist shipping law firm offering high quality legal advice and representation at a reasonable price. Please follow us on social media by clicking below.

Other Recent Blogs

  • Tendering NOR does wirelessinclude email | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    November 21, 2022

    Tendering NOR – does “wireless” include email?

    In a recent arbitration under the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (1) the Tribunal had to determine the validity of a Notice of Readiness (“NOR”) which had been tendered by email. The NOR is one of the most important documents for ship owners because it acts as a trigger to [...]

    Read more >
  • Delivery without original bills – an example of what can go wrong | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    November 7, 2022

    Delivery without original bills – an example of what can go wrong

    Readers of our blog may recall an article we released back in November 2020 in which we highlighted the risks that a ship owner is required to undertake when accepting a letter of indemnity (LOI) in exchange for releasing the cargo without the production of an original bill [...]

    Read more >
  • Supreme Court gives permission to appeal in The Polar | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    October 31, 2022

    Supreme Court gives permission to appeal in “The Polar”

    We previously reported on the High Court and Court of Appeal’s decisions in one of the last Somali ransom cases still in the Court system. The Court of Appeal held that a war risks provision in a charterparty did not constitute an agreement that the owners would not claim [...]

    Read more >
+44 203 968 0500
+44 7887 710 950