Attention Charterers seeking to add off hire periods to period charters

Attention Charterers seeking to add off hire periods to period charters | BDM Blog | BDM Law

As many of our followers will know, the market has recently been very buoyant in certain sectors. It comes as no surprise that charterers who may have fixed vessels some time ago on period terms are looking for every conceivable means to extend the charter periods so as to maximise their trading profits.

This has resulted in some interesting issues of contractual interpretation when it comes to clauses that permit a charterer to add certain off hire periods to the charter period.

Given that such clauses are invariably construed as options in favour of the charterer, it is vital that they read the clause carefully, particularly as to by when they must exercise the option. Ideally, option clauses will contain a clear deadline by when the option must be exercised. For example, if a clause states that a charterer must exercise their option to add off hire periods to the charter period by the end of the 121st month from delivery, then that’s pretty clear-cut as the date (and month) of delivery will be well known.

However, what happens if the option provides for off hire periods to be added to the maximum duration permissible under the charter and the option is to be exercised 30 or 60 days prior to redelivery? That option requires careful analysis of the maximum duration of the charter and any tolerances in terms of “about”. In one recent case that we handled, there was a dispute over the late exercise of the option in part because of charterers’ miscalculation of the correct maximum period, such that charterers counted back from the wrong date. Such errors can be costly. We advised the owners in that case. The vessel was coming to the end of a ten-year period charter. Over the course of those ten years some 90 eligible days of off hire had accrued. The charterers’ error cost them the chance to extend the charter by three months at a very favourable rate compared to the rates available in the market and it enabled our (very happy) owner clients to re-fix the vessel into a much more profitable follow-on fixture.

If there’s a moral to the story, then it is that charterers should always check the option clause carefully and, if in doubt, take legal advice well in advance so that they ensure that they exercise the option validly.

BDM is a specialist shipping law firm offering high quality legal advice and representation at a reasonable price. Please follow us on social media by clicking below.

Other Recent Blogs

  • We are thrilled to announce that BDM Law has been recognised in the Global 100 Business Excellence Award 2024 | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    May 7, 2024

    BDM Law recognised in the Global 100 Business Excellence Award 2024 – United Kingdom

    We are thrilled to announce that BDM Law has been recognised in the ‘Global 100 Business Excellence Award 2024 – United Kingdom’ by Corporate America Today. This recognition reflects our commitment to delivering bespoke legal advice and practical solutions to our clien[...]

    Read more >
  • Anti Suit Injunctions What are they and when can you get one | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    March 6, 2024

    Anti Suit Injunctions – What are they and when can you get one?

    Recently, we have been advising clients on a possible anti-suit injunction (ASI) against proceedings commenced in breach of an exclusive jurisdiction clause. On the back of that, we felt it might be useful to release this blog to shed more light on these injunctions, in part[...]

    Read more >
  • Red Sea To go or not to go | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    February 21, 2024

    Red Sea: To go or not to go?

    The world is adjusting to the new reality of ships refusing to run the risk of being targeted by missiles launched by Houthi rebels. Over 50 ships have now been targeted with some seriously damaged. So far, no crew have been killed or injured. However, the risks remain. It[...]

    Read more >
+44 203 968 0500
+44 7887 710 950