Collapse of Hin Leong spells likely problems for ship owners, operators and their insurers

Some of you may remember the seismic shock caused by the collapse of the Danish headquartered OW Bunker group back in 2014. OW was the world’s largest bunker supplier up until its collapse, owing millions of dollars to creditors. The resulting action taken by the creditor banks behind OW spawned litigation against ship owners and operators in multiple jurisdictions. Many of our clients were affected and in most cases we managed to help them. However, some clients, like many companies, ended up having to pay for bunkers twice: once to the physical supplier and then again to the OW entity through which the stem was placed. The collapse also led to the Supreme Court decision in the Res Cogitans which we reported here.

It remains to be seen if the same problems will arise with the collapse of Hin Leong and their bunkering arm Ocean Bunkering Services, as Hin Leong was not as big or international as OW. Nevertheless, it was still one of the largest suppliers in Asia and a major supplier in Singapore. The main issues will be where bunkering was sub-contracted and the physical supplier seeks to enforce its claim against the vessel. In that situation, the ship owner or operator could be exposed under the terms of the bunker supply contract.

In OW, a number of claims arose against time charterers who were exposed to claims from ship owners in relation to arrests of the vessel for unpaid bunkers in circumstances where they had paid the OW entity but the OW entity had not paid the physical supplier. It is common in all bankruptcy filings for there to be an immediate suspension of all payment activities, so we will have to see if Hin Leong’s collapse leads to a wave of arrests. That will likely depend on whether the financing banks behind Hin Leong take the same steps as those taken by the banks behind OW.

At BDM we have been dealing with issues relating to bunker supply contracts for many years. Indeed, our senior partner Bob Deering is a ship arrest specialist. For over 20 years he has chaired one of the leading international conferences on ship arrest and was heavily involved in many claims which flowed from the OW collapse. It follows that the BDM team are uniquely placed to advise our clients on issues that may arise from the Hin Leong collapse.

BDM is a specialist shipping law firm offering high quality legal advice and representation at a reasonable price. Please follow us on social media by clicking below.

Other Recent Blogs

  • Anti Suit Injunctions What are they and when can you get one | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    March 6, 2024

    Anti Suit Injunctions – What are they and when can you get one?

    Recently, we have been advising clients on a possible anti-suit injunction (ASI) against proceedings commenced in breach of an exclusive jurisdiction clause. On the back of that, we felt it might be useful to release this blog to shed more light on these injunctions, in part[...]

    Read more >
  • Red Sea To go or not to go | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    February 21, 2024

    Red Sea: To go or not to go?

    The world is adjusting to the new reality of ships refusing to run the risk of being targeted by missiles launched by Houthi rebels. Over 50 ships have now been targeted with some seriously damaged. So far, no crew have been killed or injured. However, the risks remain. It[...]

    Read more >
  • BDM partners ranked once again in Who's Who Legal Transport 2024 | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    February 19, 2024

    BDM partners ranked once again in “Who’s Who Legal: Transport 2024”

    Our founding partners have once again been listed as among the world’s leading shipping law practitioners in the Who’s Who Legal: Transport 2024 report. Congratulations to David, Nick and Bob! They commented: “We are very happy to be again recognized in this public[...]

    Read more >
+44 203 968 0500
+44 7887 710 950