Office: +44 203 968 0500
24/7 Emergency Response: +44 7887 710 950
Select Page

Collision Jurisdiction Agreements

Collision Jurisdiction Agreements | BDM Blog | BDM Law

A recent decision in the Admiralty Court is of interest because it addresses the effect of paragraph C of the standard ASG2 Collision Jurisdiction Agreement (CJA), a copy of which can be found here.

In short, paragraph C provides that parties signing a CJA under which they agree to refer all disputes to the English High Court should each provide security in respect of the other’s claim in a form reasonably satisfactory to the other.

Those interested in the facts can read the case report here, but the key point to note is that Teare J held that, although the test of what was reasonably satisfactory in terms of the security offered is an objective one and was in fact satisfied in this case, on a proper construction of paragraph C a party is not obliged to accept the security offered and could proceed to obtain security by way of arrest if it chose to do so.

This decision is of considerable interest because it begs the question of the point of paragraph C in the CJA. It remains to be seen whether there will be an appeal, but for now parties should proceed on the understanding that signing up to a CJA on the ASG2 form of wording does not remove the risk of arrest. Indeed, the only way to do that it seems is to provide security in an acceptable form that itself contains an undertaking not to arrest. In that sense, see the ASG1 form which is designed to do just that.

Nick Burgess - author profile
Nick Burgess
Partner
Constantin von Hirsch - author profile
Constantin von Hirsch
Trainee
BDM is a specialist shipping law firm offering high quality legal advice and representation at a reasonable price. Please follow us on social media by clicking below.

Other Recent Blogs

  • BIMCO release EEXI transition clause | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    May 24, 2022

    BIMCO release EEXI transition clause

    We recently commented here on the regulatory challenges faced by shipowners from 1 January 2023. To ease this burden, BIMCO have released an EEXI transition clause, a copy of which can be found here. More clauses are set to follow to deal with carbon intensity. It seems we a[...]

    Read more >
  • London Maritime Arbitration Rides out the Pandemic | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    May 17, 2022

    London Maritime Arbitration Rides out the Pandemic

    The London Maritime Arbitrators Association (LMAA) has reported a solid set of caseload statistics for 2021, despite the disruption of last year. Members reported 2777 new appointments under its Terms and Procedures in an estimated 1,657 references. The numbers are slightly [...]

    Read more >
  • London arbitration award sheds light on key issues arising under Inter Club Agreement | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    May 4, 2022

    London arbitration award sheds light on key issues arising under Inter Club Agreement

    This recent arbitration is worth a read for those interested in disputes arising under the Inter Club Agreement (“ICA”). The facts are not of huge importance save to say that this is one of the many soyabean damage claims that come across the desks of our P&I Club co[...]

    Read more >
+44 203 968 0500
+44 7887 710 950