Office: +44 203 968 0500
24/7 Emergency Response: +44 7887 710 950
Select Page

Industry experts get together to give valuable guidance on use of low sulphur fuel

Industry experts get together to give valuable guidance on use of low sulphur fuel | BDM Blog | BDM Law

Followers of our Blog will be aware of the concerns facing ship owners, operators, charterers and suppliers as a result of the rapidly approaching 1 January 2020 MARPOL deadline.

In anticipation of this change, industry experts from the International Chamber of Shipping, BIMCO, the International Group of P&I Clubs, INTERTANKO and others have collaborated to produce valuable operational guidance on the use of low sulphur fuels. It is available to download via this link.

There are also legal issues associated with the switch from high to low sulphur fuel, the removal of non-compliant fuel (which must be removed from all ships without a scrubber by 1 March 2020) and removal of sludge in tanks so that they are ready to use low sulphur fuel. Many of those legal issues turn on the particular charters in operation and we are advising clients on this on a case by case basis.

BIMCO and INTERTANKO have both released new clauses to deal with the change. The BIMCO clauses can be found here and the INTERTANKO clauses can be found here.  We are advising many clients on which clauses are most suitable. However, the new clauses do not help clients faced with problems under existing long term charters negotiated well before the MARPOL changes were even discussed. Consequently, a number of contractual disputes have developed and may well make their way to the Courts.

The other question is what happens after 1 January 2020. Over the years we have been involved in many investigations dealing with alleged MARPOL infringements arising from unauthorised discharges of oily water from ships. Those investigations are complex and time consuming. Are ship owners likely to be faced with similar issues in connection with alleged infringements of the new emissions regulations? There are arrangements in the Convention to address unanticipated non-availability of low sulphur fuel. However, enforcement is in the hands of individual states. It follows that some operators could face fines and legal and operational issues arising from infringement (loss of oil major approvals) as a consequence of factors that may be beyond their control. It is still unclear if the industry will be able to respond to demand for low sulphur fuel post 1 January 2020. They are still watching to see how many owners opt for scrubbers. In our view, it is highly likely that there will be problems in certain areas of the world when it comes to supplies of low sulphur fuel. We are therefore predicting an increase in enforcement cases, which in itself will give rise to numerous legal issues.

BDM is a specialist shipping law firm offering high quality legal advice and representation at a reasonable price. Please follow us on social media by clicking below.

Other Recent Blogs

  • Tendering NOR does wirelessinclude email | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    November 21, 2022

    Tendering NOR – does “wireless” include email?

    In a recent arbitration under the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (1) the Tribunal had to determine the validity of a Notice of Readiness (“NOR”) which had been tendered by email. The NOR is one of the most important documents for ship owners because it acts as a trigger to [...]

    Read more >
  • Delivery without original bills – an example of what can go wrong | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    November 7, 2022

    Delivery without original bills – an example of what can go wrong

    Readers of our blog may recall an article we released back in November 2020 in which we highlighted the risks that a ship owner is required to undertake when accepting a letter of indemnity (LOI) in exchange for releasing the cargo without the production of an original bill [...]

    Read more >
  • Supreme Court gives permission to appeal in The Polar | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    October 31, 2022

    Supreme Court gives permission to appeal in “The Polar”

    We previously reported on the High Court and Court of Appeal’s decisions in one of the last Somali ransom cases still in the Court system. The Court of Appeal held that a war risks provision in a charterparty did not constitute an agreement that the owners would not claim [...]

    Read more >
+44 203 968 0500
+44 7887 710 950