Office: +44 203 968 0500
24/7 Emergency Response: +44 7887 710 950
Select Page

Pushing the boat out? To what extent is it possible to recover damages after a collision?

Pushing the boat out To what extent is it possible to recover damages after a collision | BDM Blog | BDM Law

Some of you may remember the collision between the giant MSC Opera and a small river cruiser, the River Countess, in Venice back in June 2019. For those who missed it, a clip can be found here.

It was agreed by all concerned that the River Countess’ claims would be subject to Italian law. It was also agreed that MSC Opera was 100% to blame. The disputes that followed were about to what extent the River Countess could recover damages. Alongside contesting quantum, MSC questioned the ability of the tour operator to sue for lost revenue on 14 river cruises that had to be cancelled after the collision whilst the River Countess was being repaired. There was also a disputed claim for loss of goodwill and future anticipated revenue after repairs because, it was said, the River Countess had been tarnished by the publicity associated with the collision.

The tour operator, Uniworld, had chartered the River Countess and, following the decision in The Mineral Transporter [1986] AC 1, they were unable to bring a claim in tort against MSC Opera under English law. The question was whether they could recover under Italian law. This point was recently decided by the Admiralty Judge, Andrew Baker, as a preliminary issue. The full case report can be found here.

It was held that Uniworld did have title to sue for non-physical losses but this was limited to losses caused as a direct and immediate consequence of the casualty and provided that there was no prospect of bringing in a replacement vessel to undertake future cruises. The claim for loss of future anticipated revenue after repairs was held not to be recoverable in principle. The claim for loss of goodwill was said to be recoverable in principle provided that it could be proved that was a direct and immediate consequence of the casualty.

The lesson from this case is that governing law is extremely important. Here there was no question that Italian law applied because of Article 4 of the Rome II Regulation and the fact that the physical damage was done in Italy. However, in many cases the damage occurs at sea and the position is not straightforward. There are many other jurisdictions where the law adopts a different approach to damages for pure economic loss. Decisions are often made soon after the collision on law and jurisdiction and it’s important to understand the nature of the claims that may arise and their recoverability before making those decisions.

Nick Burgess - author profile
Nick Burgess
Partner
Constantin von Hirsch - author profile
Constantin von Hirsch
Trainee
BDM is a specialist shipping law firm offering high quality legal advice and representation at a reasonable price. Please follow us on social media by clicking below.

Other Recent Blogs

  • Tendering NOR does wirelessinclude email | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    November 21, 2022

    Tendering NOR – does “wireless” include email?

    In a recent arbitration under the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (1) the Tribunal had to determine the validity of a Notice of Readiness (“NOR”) which had been tendered by email. The NOR is one of the most important documents for ship owners because it acts as a trigger to [...]

    Read more >
  • Delivery without original bills – an example of what can go wrong | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    November 7, 2022

    Delivery without original bills – an example of what can go wrong

    Readers of our blog may recall an article we released back in November 2020 in which we highlighted the risks that a ship owner is required to undertake when accepting a letter of indemnity (LOI) in exchange for releasing the cargo without the production of an original bill [...]

    Read more >
  • Supreme Court gives permission to appeal in The Polar | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    October 31, 2022

    Supreme Court gives permission to appeal in “The Polar”

    We previously reported on the High Court and Court of Appeal’s decisions in one of the last Somali ransom cases still in the Court system. The Court of Appeal held that a war risks provision in a charterparty did not constitute an agreement that the owners would not claim [...]

    Read more >
+44 203 968 0500
+44 7887 710 950