Office: +44 203 968 0500
24/7 Emergency Response: +44 7887 710 950
Select Page

Deviation – bad weather following deviation?

Deviation – bad weather following deviation | BDM blog | BDM Law

Over the years, we have had numerous cases involving deviation and the usual process is to get one’s ruler out and mark out the deviation from the optimal course required by the charterer, with the time and cost of the said deviation (to include bunkers and port costs etc) being for the shipowners’ account.  That often involves a comparison of the angle of deviation and total extra sea time over the optimal route and of course a comparison of the extra time on the voyage in question.

Easy enough so far, but what happens when the vessel deviates and encounters bad weather whilst regaining its original course?  That was the issue in a recent arbitration (London Arbitration 11/22) where there was a deviation to a port in Vietnam for an agreed crew change.   After the crew change, the vessel encountered bad weather and was delayed.  The owners argued that the time and cost associated with the delay was for charterers’ account.  The charterers disagreed, arguing that this was a consequence of the deviation and thus for owners’ account.  They argued, amongst other things, that but for the deviation the vessel would not have encountered that weather and time would not have been lost.   The Tribunal decided that the consequence of the bad weather was for the charterers’ account because the deviation provision in the charter was not wide enough to encompass all the consequence of the deviation.  It simply stated that “deviation time/bunker/costs” to be for the owners’ time and account.  It seems therefore that if the parties want to agree that all consequences of a deviation should be for owners’ account, they need to insert a much wider provision in the charter.

The case in question was conducted under the Small Claims Procedure (SCP) but it involved quite complex legal issues including an argument over whether the Club handling the case for ship owners could recover their in-house legal fees (the tribunal ruled that they could). SCP cases cannot be appealed and so there is always an issue as to whether the decision is correct.

Nick Burgess - author profile
Nick Burgess
Partner
Constantin von Hirsch - author profile
Constantin von Hirsch
Trainee Solicitor
BDM is a specialist shipping law firm offering high quality legal advice and representation at a reasonable price. Please follow us on social media by clicking below.

Other Recent Blogs

  • Happy Chinese New Year from BDM | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    January 17, 2023

    Happy Chinese New Year from BDM

    Happy Chinese New Year of the Rabbit to all our clients, colleagues and friends.[...]

    Read more >
  • Happy New Year from BDM | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    January 3, 2023

    Happy New Year!

    Wishing all our clients, colleagues, friends and followers the very best for 2023. We look forward to supporting and working with you during the year ahead.[...]

    Read more >
  • CII deadline approaches – what are ship owners doing about it | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    December 14, 2022

    CII deadline approaches – what are ship owners doing about it?

    There have been many articles on the Carbon Intensity Indicator (“CII”). We first reported on this issue in February 2022. It’s worth reading the penultimate paragraph of that article as we correctly predicted the dilemma facing the industry as it seeks to adapt to a w[...]

    Read more >
+44 203 968 0500
+44 7887 710 950