Deviation – bad weather following deviation?

Deviation – bad weather following deviation | BDM blog | BDM Law

Over the years, we have had numerous cases involving deviation and the usual process is to get one’s ruler out and mark out the deviation from the optimal course required by the charterer, with the time and cost of the said deviation (to include bunkers and port costs etc) being for the shipowners’ account.  That often involves a comparison of the angle of deviation and total extra sea time over the optimal route and of course a comparison of the extra time on the voyage in question.

Easy enough so far, but what happens when the vessel deviates and encounters bad weather whilst regaining its original course?  That was the issue in a recent arbitration (London Arbitration 11/22) where there was a deviation to a port in Vietnam for an agreed crew change.   After the crew change, the vessel encountered bad weather and was delayed.  The owners argued that the time and cost associated with the delay was for charterers’ account.  The charterers disagreed, arguing that this was a consequence of the deviation and thus for owners’ account.  They argued, amongst other things, that but for the deviation the vessel would not have encountered that weather and time would not have been lost.   The Tribunal decided that the consequence of the bad weather was for the charterers’ account because the deviation provision in the charter was not wide enough to encompass all the consequence of the deviation.  It simply stated that “deviation time/bunker/costs” to be for the owners’ time and account.  It seems therefore that if the parties want to agree that all consequences of a deviation should be for owners’ account, they need to insert a much wider provision in the charter.

The case in question was conducted under the Small Claims Procedure (SCP) but it involved quite complex legal issues including an argument over whether the Club handling the case for ship owners could recover their in-house legal fees (the tribunal ruled that they could). SCP cases cannot be appealed and so there is always an issue as to whether the decision is correct.

Nick Burgess - author profile
Nick Burgess
Partner
Constantin von Hirsch - author profile
Constantin von Hirsch
Trainee Solicitor
BDM is a specialist shipping law firm offering high quality legal advice and representation at a reasonable price. Please follow us on social media by clicking below.

Other Recent Blogs

  • We are thrilled to announce that BDM Law has been recognised in the Global 100 Business Excellence Award 2024 | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    May 7, 2024

    BDM Law recognised in the Global 100 Business Excellence Award 2024 – United Kingdom

    We are thrilled to announce that BDM Law has been recognised in the ‘Global 100 Business Excellence Award 2024 – United Kingdom’ by Corporate America Today. This recognition reflects our commitment to delivering bespoke legal advice and practical solutions to our clien[...]

    Read more >
  • Anti Suit Injunctions What are they and when can you get one | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    March 6, 2024

    Anti Suit Injunctions – What are they and when can you get one?

    Recently, we have been advising clients on a possible anti-suit injunction (ASI) against proceedings commenced in breach of an exclusive jurisdiction clause. On the back of that, we felt it might be useful to release this blog to shed more light on these injunctions, in part[...]

    Read more >
  • Red Sea To go or not to go | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    February 21, 2024

    Red Sea: To go or not to go?

    The world is adjusting to the new reality of ships refusing to run the risk of being targeted by missiles launched by Houthi rebels. Over 50 ships have now been targeted with some seriously damaged. So far, no crew have been killed or injured. However, the risks remain. It[...]

    Read more >
+44 203 968 0500
+44 7887 710 950