Office: +44 203 968 0500
24/7 Emergency Response: +44 7887 710 950
Select Page

Latest from the Admiralty Court

Latest from the Admiralty Court | BDM Blog | BDM Law

On 5 October 2020, J Teare handed down his last judgement as Admiralty Judge on a collision case, involving what could aptly be described as a three-ship pile up in the Suez Canal (1). Not only does the judgment shed some light on the legal causation approach in case of multiple collisions, it also raises some interesting points from the perspective of shipping lawyers and their clients.

In July 2018, a southbound convoy of eight vessels was proceeding through the Suez Canal. The vessel at the head of the convoy had an engine problem and was subsequently anchored. Thereafter, the vessels astern of her took steps to moor or prepared to moor.

The eighth and last vessel, Panamax Alexander, failed to moor and so collided with the seventh in the convoy, Sakizaya Kalon, which was at anchor. These two vessels then collided with Osios David, the sixth vessel of the convoy, which was also anchored and moored. The collisions generated claims totalling approximately US$18M, with none of the vessels accepting any liability for the collisions.

The learned judge held that the Panamax Alexander was 100% liable. She failed to appreciate that there was a risk of collision and, as a result, failed to moor earlier in time in order to avoid that risk. This failure was deemed a causative factor to the collisions and was considered a breach of rules 5, 7 and 8 of the Collision Regulations: maintaining a proper look out, adequately assessing risk of collision, and taking action to avoid collision. Furthermore, J Teare held that while the Osios David failed to inform the vessels behind her of her intention to moor, this fault had no causative potency. In the end, the added failures of the Panamax Alexander constituted the causes of the subsequent collisions and was deemed wholly responsible and fully liable for all the collisions.

An interesting aspect of the judgment is that J Teare reflected on the evolution of ship collision cases and how they’re adjudicated in Court. Over three decades ago, computers had yet to take over, with navigational plots drawn out on paper. If a collision case came to Court, often the question to answer was where and how the vessels had come into collision. Now with computers, VDR recordings, AIS vessel tracking, and ECDIS, this question is more readily answerable, so now it has become why they collided. Indeed, in the opening paragraphs of his judgment, J Teare remarked that the information contained in VDR audio recordings allow for detailed submissions and cross-examination as to why a vessel was navigated as she was; these are relevant to questions of fault and to the degree of blameworthiness.

Furthermore, the use of technology comprised another aspect of the trial in that it was conducted entirely remotely, with all three masters cross-examined either while they were onboard their respective vessels or abroad. In a Covid-19 world, it is becoming more common for trials to be held remotely, but this trial was probably the first occasion on which evidence has been given to the Admiralty Court from the high seas.

  1. Sakizaya Kalon & Osios David v Panamax Alexander [2020] EWHC 2604 (Admlty)
BDM is a specialist shipping law firm offering high quality legal advice and representation at a reasonable price. Please follow us on social media by clicking below.

Other Recent Blogs

  • BDM supports launch of third edition of Shipping and the Environment | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    March 9, 2023

    BDM supports launch of third edition of Shipping and the Environment

    We were delighted to support Colin, Charles and Jonathan at the launch of the third edition of this weighty tome. Environmental regulation is one of the main challenges faced by shipping and all those engaged in the shipping industry. This book is not just about oil spills. [...]

    Read more >
  • BDM and London P&I attend Six Nations | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    February 15, 2023

    BDM and London P&I attend Six Nations

    David McInnes and Joshua Geesing of BDM Law were pleased to attend the Six Nations match between England and Italy alongside Simon Leslie and Simon Chapman of London P&I Club. BDM Law are committed to the Italian market and continue to service a large number of clients b[...]

    Read more >
  • 2023 and what to expect | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    February 9, 2023

    2023 and what to expect

    It’s difficult to predict what lies ahead but it’s illuminating to revisit what we said at the beginning of 2022. By and large, we were right to say that 2022 would be a strong year for shipping and ship owners. The predicted rise in ship casualties has not quite materia[...]

    Read more >
+44 203 968 0500
+44 7887 710 950