Office: +44 203 968 0500
24/7 Emergency Response: +44 7887 710 950
Select Page

Misdelivery By A Carrier After Discharge – The Hague-Visby Rules Time Bar Applies

Misdelivery By A Carrier After Discharge – The Hague-Visby Rules Time Bar Applies | BDM Blog | BDM Law

In a recent case of interest 1 the Commercial Court confirmed that the one year time bar for bringing claims against a carrier under Article III rule 6 of the Hague-Visby Rules (the HVRs) can apply to claims for mis-delivery after discharge has taken place.

Prior to this judgment there had been uncertainty as to whether the time bar under the HVRs applied in cases where the cargo is delivered at a time subsequent to discharge of the cargo from the ship. This situation often arises in the shipping industry where a carrier agrees to discharge cargo pursuant to a letter of indemnity without production of the original bills of lading. In such cases, following discharge, the cargo may be stored in a warehouse or on the quayside pending delivery of the goods. Does the carrier have the protection of the HVRs time bar in that situation?

In this case the Court ruled that the HVRs do extend beyond discharge from the ship to delivery of the cargo and therefore that the carrier would be protected by the time bar in that situation. Further, the court decided that the wording in clause 2(c) of the Congenbill form bill of lading providing that “The Carrier shall in no case be responsible for loss and damage to the cargo, howsoever arising prior to loading into and after discharge from the Vessel…” did not disapply the HVR in respect of the period after discharge.

The Court therefore made it clear that the one year time bar under the HVRs applies to the carrier’s responsibilities for the cargo not only during the carriage of the goods by sea, but also during the time the goods are stored on shore following discharge, up to the time of delivery.

This judgment will be welcome news to shipowners and carriers under bills of lading. This judgment applies to the HVRs (rather than the Hague Rules) but given the general reasoning of the judge, there is a good chance that this would also apply to cases involving the Hague Rules.

  1. FIMBank p.l.c. v KCH Shipping Co., Ltd [2022] EWHC 2400 (Comm)
Pav Samothrakis - author profile
Pav Samothrakis
Gareth Thompson - author profile
Gareth Thompson
Managing Associate
BDM is a specialist shipping law firm offering high quality legal advice and representation at a reasonable price. Please follow us on social media by clicking below.

Other Recent Blogs

  • BDM supports launch of third edition of Shipping and the Environment | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    March 9, 2023

    BDM supports launch of third edition of Shipping and the Environment

    We were delighted to support Colin, Charles and Jonathan at the launch of the third edition of this weighty tome. Environmental regulation is one of the main challenges faced by shipping and all those engaged in the shipping industry. This book is not just about oil spills. [...]

    Read more >
  • BDM and London P&I attend Six Nations | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    February 15, 2023

    BDM and London P&I attend Six Nations

    David McInnes and Joshua Geesing of BDM Law were pleased to attend the Six Nations match between England and Italy alongside Simon Leslie and Simon Chapman of London P&I Club. BDM Law are committed to the Italian market and continue to service a large number of clients b[...]

    Read more >
  • 2023 and what to expect | BDM Blog | BDM Law
    February 9, 2023

    2023 and what to expect

    It’s difficult to predict what lies ahead but it’s illuminating to revisit what we said at the beginning of 2022. By and large, we were right to say that 2022 would be a strong year for shipping and ship owners. The predicted rise in ship casualties has not quite materia[...]

    Read more >
+44 203 968 0500
+44 7887 710 950